nationwide.intake // online // 24-7 tel: 888.533.8153 · contact@natinjurylawyers.com
V-015 · POWER LINE · VERDICT

Contact With Overhead Power Line — Electrical Injury

$6.4M
VERDICT IDV-015
CASE TYPEpower line
RECOVERY$6.4M
SUMMARY

A worker sustained high-voltage electrical injuries after equipment contacted an overhead line that was not de-energized, despite a documented work-clearance request.

01

The Incident

During exterior work near an overhead distribution line, equipment came into contact with an energized conductor. A work-clearance request had been submitted in advance but the line was not de-energized when work began.

02

Establishing Liability

Utility work-order records, dispatch communications, and clearance protocols established that the request had been received but never executed. National Electrical Safety Code testimony established the required clearances and protocols. The utility's own field-operations manual confirmed the chain-of-custody failure.

03

Damages

The worker sustained high-voltage electrical injuries including entry and exit wounds, requiring multiple surgeries, skin grafts, and long-term rehabilitation. Cardiac and neurological complications produced lasting impairment.

04

Outcome

A jury returned a $6.4M verdict against the utility and its operations contractor.

Key Case Factors

  • Utility work-order and clearance request records
  • Field-operations manual and dispatch protocols
  • National Electrical Safety Code expert testimony
  • Burn-care and rehabilitation specialist testimony
  • Cardiac and neurological sequelae documentation

FREE_CASE_REVIEW

Talk to a trial lawyer today.

Confidential consultations in English or Spanish, available 24 / 7. No fee unless we recover for you.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is evaluated on its own facts. Information on this site is general information and not legal advice. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.