nationwide.intake // online // 24-7 tel: 888.533.8153 · contact@natinjurylawyers.com
V-003 · WRONGFUL DEATH · VERDICT

Industrial Workplace Fatality — OSHA Violations

$38.0M
VERDICT IDV-003
CASE TYPEwrongful death
RECOVERY$38.0M
SUMMARY

A worker was killed when a long-known equipment hazard — repeatedly flagged in internal safety audits — finally caused a catastrophic failure during a routine task.

01

The Incident

During a scheduled production run, an unguarded mechanical assembly failed without warning. The decedent, performing duties consistent with his training, had no opportunity to react. The incident occurred during the morning shift in an area covered by routine safety inspections.

02

Establishing Liability

OSHA citations following the incident documented multiple willful and repeat violations. Internal audit memoranda — produced over employer objection — showed the specific hazard had been identified more than two years before the fatality, with budget approval requested and denied. Supervisory testimony confirmed leadership knew the equipment configuration violated industry standards.

03

Damages

The decedent was a primary household earner with multiple surviving family members. Damages included lost economic support, loss of household services, and the statutory wrongful-death components recognized in the venue jurisdiction.

04

Outcome

The jury returned a $38.0M verdict, finding the employer's conduct grossly negligent and supporting an exemplary-damages component.

Key Case Factors

  • OSHA investigation file and inspector testimony
  • Internal safety-audit memoranda obtained via document request
  • Industry-standard engineering testimony on guarding
  • Forensic accounting of household economic dependency
  • Surviving-family impact testimony preserved on video

FREE_CASE_REVIEW

Talk to a trial lawyer today.

Confidential consultations in English or Spanish, available 24 / 7. No fee unless we recover for you.

Attorney advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Each case is evaluated on its own facts. Information on this site is general information and not legal advice. Contacting the firm does not create an attorney-client relationship.